#LUMINAR AI VS PHOTOSHOP SOFTWARE#

After spending hours editing a video, this is an easy way filmmakers and YouTubers can save time.ДЄlthough professionals may come to embrace AI photo editing, Luminar AI removes a lot of the barriers that come with photo editing-expensive editing software and advanced skill-making it easier for just about anybody to pick up the basics and create memorable images without years of experience. You can use the Luminar AI plug-in to quickly edit the image and use the tools in your photo editor to create a title. While Luminar AI doesnвЂ™t have any text features for creating titles, using it as a plug-in for Lightroom or Photoshop is perfect. For filmmakers and YouTubers, Luminar is a great tool to use when creating thumbnails, which has become an art in itself. And though itвЂ™s easy to pick up and use, there are still advanced features for those with the know-how.ДЄdobe enthusiasts donвЂ™t have to disrupt their editing workflow, as Luminar AI can also work as a plug-in for Photoshop and Lightroom. At $79-thatвЂ™s a one-time fee-for a single license, Luminar AI does far more than I expected.

The latest photo editing software keeps Luminar 4вЂ™s best features while adding more advanced portrait and landscape photography features. Not that Luminar is substandard here, rather it is that DXO excels in this area.Luminar AI is the photo editing software for all-accessible, affordable, and effective at making professionals out of amateurs.ДЄfter months of teasing their newest AI-assisted software, Skylum has finally released Luminar AI, a feature-packed follow-up to Luminar 4 thatвЂ™s available for macOS and Windows. DXO was much faster to use and produced a slightly better result. This test pitched one of DXOвЂ™s major strengths against LuminarвЂ™s image detail and sharpening tools. DXO Photo Lab 4 vs Luminar V4 вЂ“ Sharpening вЂ“ Conclusion Check back soon to see how these two tools compare with the artistic side of RAW development. As I said in the previous video, DXO is king with technical RAW conversion.Д«ut what about enhancing this image further? It is dull, and the sky needs work. The results are both good, but DXO was much faster in use. So far, I would score this result in DXOвЂ™s favour. DXOвЂ™s sharpening is even across the entire frame, cancelling out the weaknesses of the lens without over-processing the strengths. This is the problem with global sharpening. Whether you would notice this in the final result, on screen or in print, is another matter.ДЄreas of the Luminar image are sharper than DXOвЂ™s but other areas are not as good.

Let us see how they compare.ДXO has a tiny edge, especially when viewed at 200% and looking at the edge of the mountain вЂ“ DXO is cleaner and crisper. Luminar features tools for sharpening: AI Structure and Details Enhancer and a regular Unsharp Mask tool. RAW converters that only offer unsharp mask sharpening do not, therefore, have any real advantage over traditional photo editors, such as Photoshop or Affinity Photo.ДXO Photo Lab has very sophisticated sharpening вЂ“ it has sharpening profiles that match your camera and lens and its RAW sharpening targets areas where your lens is soft, typically the corners and edges.

Traditional sharpening tools, such as the ubiquitous unsharp mask, are too general and are usually global, affecting the entire image. Too much, too soon is as bad as too little too late. Getting the sharpening done correctly is essential. Last, we should sharpen the image after resizing for its target medium вЂ“ either for on screen viewing or for printing. Second, we should sharpen it after post processing. First, the image needs sharpening during the RAW conversion. Sharpening is best done in several steps. Today, I am focusing on a very specific RAW conversion step вЂ“ sharpening. My test was an end to end development of a RAW image. In my last post and video, I looked at DXO Photo Lab version 4 versus Luminar version 4.

#LUMINAR AI VS PHOTOSHOP SERIES#

This is the second in a series of posts comparing DXO Photo Lab 4 and Luminar 4.

Luminar ai vs photoshop